Street Democracy writes:
This policy ‘sounds’ good as we all want children to be loved and emotionally stable.
We all want to see, well-adjusted and balanced children happy and free-spirited.
However, if you step aside from this policy for a moment you may see this as being not so innocent but definitely another severe social control mechanism.
In fact this is another psychopathic main frame, of no empathy infrastructure to force parents to become obedient cogs of the machine.
The removal of freedom of thought and creativity away from family upbringing. It is the removal of your basic human rights to raise your family as you see fit.
It is a numbing assault upon parenting demonising us all as ‘child abusers’.
All of us make mistakes, in fact we never know if we have been successful or if something was a good idea until usually after we have done it.
Are we to be punished for organic and natural progression, as mistakes bring wisdom an integral part of being human and how we learn?
We learn regularly from our mistakes! It is almost how we learn in everything we do!
The drugging of our children is child abuse but its by the corporate state so that’s ok then!
Never let your child cry, shout or scream whether at home or in public outside, just in case someone ‘hears’ scenario is a nightmare for all parents.
It is a warrantless invasion into homes.
It is localising some form of punishing agenda to all parents who do not comply.
This isn’t about extreme child abuser’s but about the ordinary man and woman within each community being judged as unfit and uncouth barbaric members of the public who do not belong to the wealthy elite.
Imprisoning children subjecting them to intense behavioural programming of submissive obedience never question authority to be a good citizen and never listen to your parents!
Children test the boundaries of their parents daily, some more than others, where it is down to the parent to say ‘no’ or ‘enough’ or to set the social rules for children to learn from!
It is how we learn as families as to what is tolerated, acceptable and not acceptable behaviour by both the child and parent.
Sometimes as parents we may discipline to heavily and feel bad after wards and apologise to the child but explain if you push the patience of people, they sometimes get cross so a child knows not too push people too far in the future.
Sometimes children over react in a given circumstance, but it is how they learn.
Learning how to behave, what is right what is wrong, is an organic progression of normal psychological growth and social learning.
It is normal behaviour and not to be punishable by the state.
If you haven’t read this book, read it and you will recognise immediately similar tactics leading us forward to an Orwellian punishing police state.
You only now need some ‘bitch’ of a neighbour to ring social services to say the last final bit of some part of a conversation they may have heard – ‘and she shouted at her child saying ‘enough!’ and I could see the child crying….’
Is this enough to bring the Child Police round, Social Workers armed with judged signed warrants to take your child?
To have the state-owned by corporations that control our corporate government means they will own our children. Corporations owned by Satanic wealthy families of bloodline decent.
We are seeing more staged propaganda of paedophilia being bombarded in the news and yes it is good to recognise the evil and name and shame, but on the other hand they may have a darker agenda.
To normalise paedophilia and remove our outrage as the state has spoken.
Also, the increasingly paranoid ruling elite do not like us biological or guardians of the ‘real’ world teaching our children.
Influencing our children the way we want them influenced.
The state, owned by corporations that control our corporate government want our children to think in a preferred manner.
It is ‘George Orwell’s 1984’, or an exaggeration of ‘Hitler’s Youth’ to condition children to be obedient citizens of the state’s choosing or parents will be punished for raising rebellious children!
The state criminalise’s free thinking children who do not comply or conform and don’t wish to obey authority are severely punished.
School is a factory of heavily indoctrinated intense behavioural training, of state preferred, corporately trained, hived minded, common core, submissive subjects that are taught by authority figures that never like being questioned.
So children are being taught, never question authority.
Robotic social programming-we surrender our children to be controlled and remove their free creativity by rules, and submissive obedience.
To remove, snatch or abduct a child by Social Workers can so easily be done.
They just turn up with a referral and that doesn’t have to be accurate or true as how does anyone know at that stage unless something traumatic or an incident was filmed.
What if everything you do is deemed wrong!
We make mistakes as a natural part of being human to gain our experiences in life.
What if they ask how many mistakes you have made in one day?
What if it gets this intensive?
How do you know a crime of child abuse has occurred without investigation which is equally as traumatic, socially invasive and indoctrinated by leading and suggestive questioning?
They forcibly remove the children against the parents or guardians consensus and will.
What if you question this and disagree?
Or click here to watch Staffordshire Social Services remove a one day old baby from it’s mother. Warning though it is traumatic to watch just scroll down to see video. They have removed this video from You Tube so to watch it you have to enter another topic:
Do Social Services (SS) write down on report your rebelling against governmental legislation and therefore deemed a bad citizen with questionable judgement even though you’d be right to question.
What if you show a legitimate rage at their accusations of child abuse for you simply disciplining your child?
Will they suggest you are an unreasonable and aggressive citizen that shouldn’t have your children for sure!
The removal of self determinism, of self awareness of organic growing, of truth by serious governmental deception is not going to equate with a healthy well-balanced future.
They then drug the children to subdued them claiming the child was unsettled.
Later they will say the child has to be drugged (now the child is addicted or naturally emotionally traumatised) and has mental health problems because the child is screaming for their parents and is now deemed inappropriate behaviour.
We all have our mental health issues.
No one is ‘normal’ or ‘perfect’ but they are now playing on this as serious risks of normal members of society as having mental illnesses that need to be recognised.
That we need ‘their’ society that ‘they’ deem fit for ‘us’ to follow or be punished.
Be investigated in other words to prove your sanity as a ‘fit parent’ which is impossible to do as there is no such thing as a perfect parent.
It is an impossible statement, mission and a dangerous agenda to follow.
Will they say normal parents raising their own children will be encouraging their own issues to be naturally indoctrinated by their own children, social family habits for example and this needs to be watered down?
For social habits of families programmed into their children’s minds then according to the state there is a need to wipe out this and the child’s own mental health issues before they reach adolescence.
Like it is a major threat to society by labelling and socially classifying mental health as potentially dangerous and justifying drugging children.
Legalisation of child drugging for submissive behaviour easily controlled dumbing down which I call child abuse by the state.
It is becoming increasingly frightening for parents.
Never mind whether good parenting can lead to a rebellious child and bad parenting can lead a child to significantly high moral characterisation within themselves.
Growing up knowing what not to do as their bad parents did.
Bad parenting has given valuable lessons of knowledge.
A child now grown realising certain qualities were missed with their childhood and not wanting to be bad parents to their own child in the future is a lesson most priceless that can never be taught in school.
We all need to be natural and unique in our own individual ways to raise our families as organically as we can.
What isn’t healthy is to conform to a hive mind mentality whether natural or not, to be dictated too by ‘experts’ corporately trained by corporate text books on ‘how to raise children’.
Forced adoptions by Secret Family Courts by unscrupulous Social Workers who get paid lots of money per child taken into care.
It is a sterile progression far removed from the natural nurturing of mother and fatherhood.
It is the decimation of organic love and bonding between parents and children by removing the organic characterisation, the individualism of families.
We are all different and unique, we are not ‘Leggo’ pieces, unemotional, detached and disconnected.
What isn’t healthy is to create a society of highly paranoid mothers and fathers scarred to discipline their child fearing someone over hearing (half the conversation or situation with your young) putting 2 and 2 together to make 7.
As poverty is increased by the state, it is making life more difficult for parents and poor families to behave in a certain way that is socially conditioned as the norm if the norm costs money.
Criminalising poverty may make it impossible for poor parents to financially invest in their children giving the SS another reason to take the child away. ‘You can’t afford to be parents scenario’
This is especially if the state raises the bar of what is deemed financially acceptable and demonising the poor to be too poor to raise children.
‘Your too poor! You’re unemployed! You’re a disabled citizen relying on benefits! ‘You are poor and cannot afford your children!’
This may be a real ‘coming to a community near you’ scenario especially if they remove and bankrupt the Welfare State.
What will happen to children of poor families? They’ll be taken away as poverty will be viewed as unnecessary child abuse
If everything becomes privatised, the NHS in particular, it maybe like having pets ‘if you can’t afford to insure your pets, then you can’t afford to have them!’
What if they take away benefits or demonise benefits as socially wrong, therefore ‘you cannot afford your children or you are socially damaging them by claiming benefits.
The removal of your children will be taken this coming Monday, your’s truly ‘The SS’ (Social Services).
Are we going to see an increase in child snatching by the SS, (Social Services) because of that ‘bitch’ of a neighbour who is jealous of you and your life style?
Are parents especially fathers changing nappies going to be accused of sexually touching their child by some unscrupulous walker by?
What if Daddy is checking for nappy rash in the folds of skin which is normal of a child wearing nappies?
What if he has to apply cream with eyes of concentration and what if this is read wrongly as something else, something sexual by some idiot glancing from across the street?
A mother who says ‘I will not listen to your whining any more’ after the child has gone on and on, and carries on walking to then be spotted by some idiot nosey busy body on the street who makes that phone call.
‘Oh yes, she raised her voice and the poor child is being deliberately traumatised by the mother-come quick?
Corporate hive mind worker bees who are dumb enough to follow the program but smart enough to work the cogs of the machine- those who don’t are punished.
Are schools going to intimately question children who may be scolded at home and feeling cross with their parents tell the teachers anything the leading questions suggest, which will be designed to suggest child abuse at home?
For more on the ‘Brave New World by Audous Huxley, of state grown and owned children click here for more or continue reading:
‘Parents who emotionally abuse their children could face prosecution for the first time under a new “Cinderella Law”.
Starving offspring of love and affection could lead to up to 10 years in prison in a move to be unveiled in the Queen’s Speech in early June.
Currently, the law on child neglect, which affects as many as one in ten children, covers physical harm only.
Under the new proposals, anything that intentionally harmed a child’s “physical intellectual, emotional, social or behavioural development” would be a crime.
Offences could include deliberately ignoring a child, damaging their emotional growth by not showing them any love and forcing them to see domestic violence.’