Judge blasts social workers telling them they ‘are not above the law’ after they remove nine-year-old from family then keep him away without consent

Judge blasts social workers telling them they ‘are not above the law’ after they remove nine-year-old from family then keep him away without consent

‘A judge has blasted social workers who he said illegally withheld a nine-year-old boy from his mother.

Judge Gareth Jones said that social services were not above the law and that he suspected proper procedures were not followed in order to save money.

Now the mother – who won an injunction to have her son returned to her immediately – is seeking damages from Anglesey County Council in North Wales.’

Read more: Judge blasts social workers telling them they ‘are not above the law’ after they remove nine-year-old from family then keep him away without consent


Clause 99, Catch 22 – State sadism and silencing the vulnerable

Clause 99, Catch 22 – State sadism and silencing the vulnerable kittysjones


Here is the Hansard record of The Work Capability Assessments – Mandatory Reconsideration adjournment debate – it’s the 6th debate about Employment Support Allowance (ESA) tabled by Labour MP Sheila Gilmore, who has worked very hard to present her gathered and substantial evidence to an indifferent government about the terrible consequences of their sadistic sickness and disability “reforms”.

Section 102 and Schedule 11 of the Welfare Reform Act, (Clause 99) is the (State) Power to require revision before appeal. People who wish to challenge a benefit decision will no longer be allowed to lodge an appeal immediately. Instead, the government introduced mandatory revision or review stage, during which a different Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) decision maker will reconsider the original decision and the evidence and, if necessary, send for more information.

We have campaigned since 2012 to raise awareness of Clause 99. During the Consultation period, I wrote a response to the government’s proposals, which many people used as a template for their own responses. I remember that Black Triangle, amongst others, ran a campaign also, and I remember that we ALL RAISED THE SAME CONCERNS.

We have had a system of ‘legal’ fiction imposed upon us called maritime law. It is a fiction

We have had a system of ‘legal’ fiction imposed upon us called maritime law. It is a fiction.


“There are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters”

Two things everyone on the planet needs to know. We have had a system of ‘legal’ fiction imposed upon us called maritime law. It is a fiction. There is no such thing except aboard a ship at sea.

Second, those in the United States, please recall that each of the fifty states is sovereign. That has never ever been dissolved, never would be, and the states had collectively agreed to act as a body for certain purposes. That body and the states within it, are being illegally managed by the separate corporation that is Washington DC.

There are three such corporations: Washington DC, The City of London, and Vatican City.

Here’s the third thing everyone needs to know, actually:


11 States have constituted the Administration of the Common Law Jury in all counties: New York 2-27-14; Florida 3-15-14; Connecticut 3-15-14; Rhode Island 3-15-14; New Jersey 3-22-14; New Hampshire 3-29-14; Arizona 3-31-14; Massachusetts 4-1-14; Maryland 4-5-14; Maine 4-12-14; Washington 5-18-14

Next time you see anything visual… a photo or a news report or a video or even a film that includes a courtroom or perhaps a political press conference, have a good look at the flags flying in the picture. No matter what country is represented by such flag, if it bears a gold braid border it is a signal that this entity is under “maritime law.” That means that a courthouse is a ship, essentially, and the judge is the captain of the ship in the wheelhouse.

The gold fringe is not part of the American flag known as the Stars and Stripes, but it is a legal symbol indicating that the court, government building, school or soldier is operating under British Maritime Law and the Uniform Commercial Code; military and merchant law.

Cop sexually assaults woman at family court then arrests her for questioning it. All in front of a judge.

Cop sexually assaults woman at family court then arrests her for questioning it. All in front of a judge.

A KLAS-TV Las Vegas news clip showing a woman named Monica Contreras attending a family court, where family court marshall Ron Fox had previously ushered her into a waiting room for a “drugs search”, during which she alleged that Fox sexually assaulted her.

Marshal James Kenyon then moves to arrest her and tells her the only way she can avoid arrest is to step up to the microphone and retract the allegations. She agrees to do so, but at the microphone does the opposite, repeating her allegations, prompting her alleged abuser to order her to be taken to jail.

Over a period of approximately four minutes, Contreras pleads with the judge to listen to her, but Donninger never acknowledges Contreras, preferring instead to talk and play with Contreras’ daughter.

A later internal investigation by Clark County courts validated Contreras’ claims.’

Babylon Is Fallen

Babylon Is Fallen by by kate u/v kaia

Pics displayed by Street Democracy


1. NAME: The master key to the entire system’s/CROWN  CORPORATION’S game. The NAME is the lynch pin to the entire legal/control construct.

Without a LEGAL NAME, which is your consent by agreeing to be said NAME, the system vampires cannot literally feed on your life blood/creation source energy that is typically shown in the physical materials we collect.

It is only the CONSENT to be/use/have a LEGAL NAME/Mark of the Beast that is required for your absolute spiritual contract/deal with the devil motif to be in FULL FORCE AND EFFECT with you as a SLAVE and them as MASTER.

For PROOF of this, look and see how much of your life/existence involves a LEGAL NAME and you will see the measure of control the system has over you.


2. REGISTER/REGISTRATION etc. : Any/all things registered are FULLY SURRENDERED with consent to the CROWN CORPORATION with NO legal recourse until such things are removed by exposing the INTENT by those who serve the CROWN CORPORATION to commit fraud knowingly/unknowingly.

ex: A child that is REGISTERED is CROWN PROPERTY by ignorant consent where the truth of REGISTERING was not brought forth which is the original INTENT by CROWN CORPORATION SERVANT’S OWNERS to have people offer their children unknowingly into slavery of soul, and thus, body.

It’s the soul they’re really after, so keep that in mind.


3. MONEY, GOLD, SILVER, ASSETS, BITCOIN etc. are ALL illusions of value where YOU are the true creator of all physical manifestations.

Money, external value, has been the tool as the third party interloper “middle man” that has made draining your power possible.

Money or the like only has value if one has been duped into thinking it does. This illusion is the ultimate distraction and destroyer of creator souls, literally. ALL money is based on the soul CONTRACT commonly known as a BIRTH CERTIFICATE.

For more click here for:

Babylon Is Fallen by by kate u/v kaia

Bedroom Tax Court Case Win For Disabled Woman Jacqueline Carmichael And Husband ‘Gives Thousands Hope’

Bedroom Tax Court Case Win For Disabled Woman Jacqueline Carmichael And Husband ‘Gives Thousands Hope’

by Huffinton Post pictures displayed by Street Democracy.


An aggressive housing policy the bedroom tax is not fit for purpose-isn’t solving the housing crisis and hasn’t stopped the wealth from hoarding land and property causing scarcity in both areas.

Street Democracy writes:


Our Tory punishing state is no more apparent than the toxic bedroom tax.

It shows nothing but disdain towards the poorest families and individuals by this demonisation slowly being adopted by society, dividing communities and placing the blame of the failing economy upon the poor.

It is an outrage to be down trodden by society, by your own government because of your disabilities and daring to be poor, and daring to hoard a spare bedroom of 6ft v 6ft if that.


Iain Duncan Smith is a psychopath, out of touch, following a psychopathic agenda named the bedroom tax, amplifying misery for hundreds of thousands.

For daring to need a spare room for essential disability equipment. For daring to have a spare bedroom to sleep in if you can’t share a bed with your partner.

It is almost a demonisation of being part of the disabled poor for not being able to run a marathon or climb Mount Everest and be part of the disabled athletics team.

Some disabled people suffer from chronic pain as well making even being a wake a painful and rotten experience they have to deal with.

Pain doesn’t always come with a flag announcing someone is in pain.



However, the bedroom tax is a demonisation process and agenda for any social housing tenant daring to hoard a spare bedroom whilst being out of work, working part time or disabled and not contributing towards a working week.

Those in need of housing benefit in other words.

For if you don’t need housing benefit and you are working enough to cover your rent, then you can have as many bedrooms as you like.

The bedroom tax has created fear of living for many victims of this most putrid and aggressive housing policy. 


It has generated perpetual debt, a housing trap with no smaller properties to move into, it has generated fear of evictions with fear of being in rent arrears.

This housing policy has failed to solve the housing crisis mainly as the wealth of the nation and private commercial interest have bought and hoard all the land creating land scarcity, creating the housing crisis in the first place.


The bedroom tax is therefore not fit for purpose and needs to be scrapped alongside ATOS, we the public are quite prepared to hold and celebrate two funerals for both ATOS and the bedroom tax.

For more on the desperate plight however of fighting the bedroom tax and for once a winning outcome click here for the Huffinton Post or continue reading:


Bedroom Tax Court Case Win For Disabled Woman Jacqueline Carmichael And Husband ‘Gives Thousands Hope’

by Huffinton Post

A couple has won a court case to be exempt from the so-called bedroom tax after arguing they needed two rooms due to the woman’s severe disability, potentially opening the door for thousands in similar circumstances to come forward.

Jacqueline Carmichael, who has spina bifida, and husband Jayson won their civil case against Sefton Council, meaning they will not have to pay an extra £56 a month on their two-bedroom flat in Southport, The Liverpool Echo reported.

Mrs Carmichael, 42, uses a wheelchair, cannot walk and requires an electronic mattress which helps alleviate the pressure of bed sores. Their flat is too small to accommodate two beds, meaning Mr Carmichael has to sleep in the other room.

jayson jacqueline carmichael

The judge said the Carmichaels were entitled to two bedrooms under the Human Rights Act 

The paper reported that a judge ruled: “The appellant is entitled to two bedrooms under the provision of the Human Rights Act and no under occupancy reduction of 14% should be made on his benefit entitlement.”

Sue Bott, the director of policy and development at charity Disability Rights, told The Huffington Post UK she was “absolutely delighted” at the ruling and said she believed it was relevant to “thousands” of people unable to share a bedroom with a disabled loved one.

She added: “We know lots of people in this situation and we would expect councils to take note (of the decision).”

At last! Victory on secret courts: Rulings in family cases to be made public after Mail campaign against cloak of anonymity

At last! Victory on secret courts: Rulings in family cases to be made public after Mail campaign against cloak of anonymity

‘Decisions by secret courts that can lead to children being taken from their parents or old people forced into care homes are finally to be opened up to public scrutiny.

Under rules set out yesterday, future judgments in the family courts and the Court of Protection must be made public except in cases where there is a clear reason to dictate they should not be.

Councils applying to take children into care or to take control of the lives of the old and sick can no longer hide behind a cloak of anonymity.’

Read more: At last! Victory on secret courts: Rulings in family cases to be made public after Mail campaign against cloak of anonymity

Mother-of-four told severely disabled son, 18, can’t live with her ‘because she wants to home-school him’

Street Democracy writes:

State stealing antics by the new SS of the day, our Social Services who high five when they win a court case to snatch a child from the arms of their mother, as in this case.

A sickening twisted state of affairs where the ruling elite never remove children from the rich, it’s the hardworking trying to survive families that are targeted.


They splutter all the reasons of insanity of why this mother cannot keep her son. None make any sense and it causes maximum harm, it inflicts state control and instigates fear to any other mother daring to home school their child.

The state want all children as early as possible to be in government controlled educational facilities that look more and more like prisons than schools.

The decent and most logical way forward here would be to congratulate this mother for dedicating her life to her children, not abandoning her child, but where her love, her maternal instincts are placed morally high above all else should be given money to continue to do her job well.

Not rip her son from her arms, not devastate her child further and be plunged into the hands of strangers. Our ruling elite are psychopaths that relish all acts of sadism to hurt, destroy and rip the soul’s of good decent people. My heart goes out to this mother.


‘A desperate mother has been told by a top judge that her teenage son cannot live with her because she is an advocate of home schooling.

The mother-of-four, in her 50s, says her son is being ‘deprived of his liberty’ by being forced to attend a conventional school.

She told London’s Appeal Court she had home-schooled the disabled teenager for 10 years, along with two of her other children.

But, after he was admitted to hospital as an in-patient in 2011, she was informed by Northamptonshire County Council that the boy would not be allowed to return to the family home – because her alternative stance on education was ‘not in his best interests’.’

Read more: Mother-of-four told severely disabled son, 18, can’t live with her ‘because she wants to home-school him’


Tenant wins appeal against the bedroom tax




Annie Harrower-Gray at her home in Anstruther, Fife

Street Democracy writes:

The ‘Bedroom Tax’ is one of the various suppression techniques used over social housing tenants as with the now complex benefit system. Without adopting any form of conscience or empathy consideration, the ‘Bedroom Tax’ has evolved with full intention by the Tory Government, a ruthless and malicious form of housing policy.

The Welfare Reform Act 2012 produced rancid and morally blunt housing policy penalising all social housing tenants daring to have a spare room and in need of Housing Benefit. The financial blackmail of move out of your home of pay after having benefits harshly reduced has brought social carnage with the social housing market.

Our social situation has been ruthlessly ravaged and exploited and we now feel dehumanised and humiliated. Forced to declare our living habits to unsympathetic housing staff, dispassionate and uncaring and firing imposing questions to their satisfaction has caused instant death of trust between social housing staff and social housing landlords.

The putrid ‘Bedroom Tax’ is what the poor have to stomach every day, with perpetual debt growing all the time and a constant threat of eviction if they don’t pay. It is good to hear of one tenant being saved, it is good that democracy may have been given some breath of life after all the campaigning to get this housing policy scrapped. For more on this story click here for Inside Housing or continue to read below.


A tenant has won one of the first tribunal appeals against the bedroom tax.

Annie Harrower-Gray had her appeal against Fife Council’s decision to cut her benefit upheld by a first-tier tribunal in Scotland following a hearing on 26 August.

Under the bedroom tax, social housing households of working age have their benefit cut if they are deemed to have spare bedrooms. The Department for Work and Pensions has not defined a bedroom, saying it is up to landlords to ‘accurately describe the property in line with the actual rent charged’. Councils are responsible for awarding the benefit using information provided by the social landlord.

Fife Council implemented a cut in Ms Harrower-Gray’s benefit, on the basis she is living alone in a three bedroom property, which is owned by Kingdom Housing Association. The tribunal found however that the property has only one bedroom.

Ms Harrower-Gray’s home dates from 1660 and may have at one time been part of a manse, the tribunal ruling says. This means it has ‘an unusual and irregular layout and non-standard apartments.’ The ruling, by tribunal judge Simon Collins QC, added that due to the age of the property and ‘clumsy internal rearrangement’, ‘it is not possible for me to say…whether any particular apartment was originally designed to fulfil any particular purpose.’